There’s a saying: Justice is blind. We all know it’s really more of an aspiration. Biases are held by just about every human on the planet. So, here’s an exercise that may prove useful while a cyclist v. car post-tragedy plays out in Toronto. Let’s consider things reversed. How would this horrible case be viewed by authorities and the news-consuming public if?
- The driver had been a sober “everyman” behind the wheel of a car with his spouse, no pending warrants, or a run-in with police officers an hour prior
- The cyclist had been a former attorney general with alcohol consumed, a hot temper, and an earlier warning from police to stay away from his girlfriend
Think about that for a few seconds. Yes, I know the likelihood of such a scenario (social standings flipped and time of night) is beyond a stretch. But try anyway. Change your perspective? Really be honest. Here’s why: It’s easy for observers to dismiss the dead “bike courier” as a hooligan and troublemaker who provoked and hastened his own death, regardless of what led up to the fatal confrontation and who was “at fault.” It’s much harder to prepare, file and try a criminal legal case based on corrobated eyewitness accounts, surveillance video, physical evidence, and law enforcement’s commitment to finding the truth.
If justice is truly blind, it only sees facts, balances them, and applies the law equally, no matter who you are.
Related posts:
- Staying safe I got a nice email from the folks at Yield2Life earlier this month after sharing a tweet about a crash. I promised I would expand on the experience in a few “micro chapters.” The hope: lessons can be learned and used by other cyclists to avoid the same fate. Any...
- The Man Today’s post comes from Derek Hasel of Adelaide, Australia. As a self-described “Total Cycling Nut” and a devoted fan of The Man, I was excited that living in Adelaide, Australia, host city of the “Tour Down Under” might just provide a chance to experience a Lance Armstrong Twitter Ride. As...
- How to tell you’re a serious cyclist Are you a serious cyclist? I mean seriously devoted? Dedicated? Absorbed? Perhaps obsessed? You don’t have to be a licensed Category 1 racer. You don’t need to have conquered Alpe d’Huez. You don’t even need to own a 15-pound exotic carbon fiber road bike. Seriousness isn’t measured in ability or...
- The Soul Cyclist With all the high-tech ways to measure your cycling performance, it’s easy to over analyze. By this, I mean get lost in the numbers. What’s my average wattage? Where’s my threshold? What’s my red zone for heart rate? Cadence? Hill gradient? Um, shoot, almost forgot: speed? It’s a wonder the...
- Less is more Ran the numbers tonight. Not bad. YTD mileage is nearly identical to 2009 — a tad under 3,000 miles, or closing in on 5,000 kilometers (counting missed mileage from Mt. Laguna Cycling Classic, Death Valley Double, Borrego Double Ordeal and a few in-town shorties). But one major change in the...







{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
On a related note: How blind is justice when the likely prosecutors are colleagues of the accused?
Somewhat related, here’s a petition for more laws protecting cyclists.
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/cyclist-against-reckless-driving.html